bug#41634: 'timeout' returning 124 and 133

[Bernhard Voelker]

On 2020-06-01 10:01, Jonny Grant wrote:
> My mistake missing that. But could the 137 be listed explicitly?
> ie.
> "It may be  necessary  to  use the KILL (9) signal, since this signal cannot 
> be caught, in which case the exit status is 
> 137 (128+9) rather than 124."

thanks for the suggestion.

I think this could still be improved:
there is still the open question what happens when the KILL signal
is sent either to timeout(1) or to COMMAND.
The attached patch tries to clarify.

Have a nice day,
Berny

0001-doc-timeout-further-clarify-exit-status-after-KILL-s.patch
Description: Text Data