[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#39236: [musl] coreutils cp mishandles error return from lchmod
From: |
Rich Felker |
Subject: |
bug#39236: [musl] coreutils cp mishandles error return from lchmod |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jan 2020 10:15:07 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Rich Felker:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 03:34:18PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> * Rich Felker:
> >>
> >> > coreutils should be opting to use the system-provided lchmod, which is
> >> > safe, and correctly handling error returns (silently treating
> >> > EOPNOTSUPP as success) rather than as hard errors.
> >>
> >> glibc's lchmod always returns ENOSYS (except on Hurd). I don't know how
> >> lchmod is used in coreutils, but I suspect it is not particularly
> >> useful.
> >
> > When preserving permissions (cp -p, archive extraction, etc.), you
> > want lchmod to work correctly just for the purpose of *not* following
> > the link and thereby unwantedly changing the permissions of the link
> > target. But, fchmodat with AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW works just as well and
> > is standard, and that's really what coreutils should be using.
>
> I think you misread what I wrote: lchmod *always* returns ENOSYS. Even
> if the file is not a symbolic link. Likewise, fchmodat with
> AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW *always* returns ENOTSUP.
Yes, I understood that. I was going into why there should be a real
implementation, but didn't make it clear that that was what I was
doing.
> The reason for this is that the kernel does not provide a suitable
> system call to implement this, even though some file systems allow a
> mode change for symbolic links. I think we can do better, although I
> should note that each time we implement such emulation in userspace, it
> comes back to bite us eventually.
Emulations in userspace that are approximate, have race conditions,
etc. are bad. Ones that are rigorous are good, though.
Rich
- bug#39237: coreutils cp mishandles error return from lchmod, Rich Felker, 2020/01/22
- bug#39236: [musl] coreutils cp mishandles error return from lchmod, Florian Weimer, 2020/01/22
- bug#39236: [musl] coreutils cp mishandles error return from lchmod, Rich Felker, 2020/01/22
- bug#39236: [musl] coreutils cp mishandles error return from lchmod, Florian Weimer, 2020/01/22
- bug#39236: [musl] coreutils cp mishandles error return from lchmod,
Rich Felker <=
- bug#39236: [musl] coreutils cp mishandles error return from lchmod, Florian Weimer, 2020/01/22
- bug#39236: [musl] coreutils cp mishandles error return from lchmod, Rich Felker, 2020/01/22
- bug#39236: [musl] coreutils cp mishandles error return from lchmod, Florian Weimer, 2020/01/22
- bug#39236: [musl] coreutils cp mishandles error return from lchmod, Rich Felker, 2020/01/22
- bug#39236: [musl] coreutils cp mishandles error return from lchmod, Florian Weimer, 2020/01/22
- bug#39236: [musl] coreutils cp mishandles error return from lchmod, Rich Felker, 2020/01/22
- bug#39236: [musl] coreutils cp mishandles error return from lchmod, Florian Weimer, 2020/01/22
- bug#39236: [musl] coreutils cp mishandles error return from lchmod, Paul Eggert, 2020/01/22
- bug#39236: [musl] coreutils cp mishandles error return from lchmod, Rich Felker, 2020/01/22