[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#29961: [PATCH] mv: document the missing atomicity of 'mv -n'
From: |
Kamil Dudka |
Subject: |
bug#29961: [PATCH] mv: document the missing atomicity of 'mv -n' |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Jan 2018 17:27:14 +0100 |
On Wednesday, January 3, 2018 4:08:51 PM CET Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Eep, Seems like we should use RENAME_NOREPLACE in this case,
> rather than document the caveat?
Thanks for the suggestion! I will give it a try...
Kamil
> This is already used in shred.
>
> cheers,
> Pádraig
- bug#29961: [PATCH] mv: document the missing atomicity of 'mv -n', Kamil Dudka, 2018/01/03
- bug#29961: [PATCH] mv: document the missing atomicity of 'mv -n', Pádraig Brady, 2018/01/03
- bug#29961: [PATCH] mv: document the missing atomicity of 'mv -n',
Kamil Dudka <=
- bug#29961: [PATCH] mv -n: do not overwrite the destination, Kamil Dudka, 2018/01/04
- bug#29961: [PATCH] mv -n: do not overwrite the destination, Paul Eggert, 2018/01/04
- bug#29961: [PATCH] mv -n: do not overwrite the destination, Kamil Dudka, 2018/01/04
- bug#29961: [PATCH] mv -n: do not overwrite the destination, Paul Eggert, 2018/01/04
- bug#29961: [PATCH] mv -n: do not overwrite the destination, Kamil Dudka, 2018/01/05
- bug#29961: [PATCH] mv -n: do not overwrite the destination, Pádraig Brady, 2018/01/05
- bug#29961: [PATCH] mv -n: do not overwrite the destination, Kamil Dudka, 2018/01/05
- bug#29961: [PATCH] mv -n: do not overwrite the destination, Paul Eggert, 2018/01/05
- bug#29961: [PATCH] mv -n: do not overwrite the destination, Bernhard Voelker, 2018/01/06