[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k? |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Jun 2013 16:53:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
unarchive 11794 13902
forcemerge 11794 13902 14525
stop
On 06/01/2013 02:02 AM, Linda Walsh wrote:
>
> in Coreutils 8.21.1.1 (x86_64) on snoozy
> When I type in ls -k, I get a small listing (filenames only horizontally)
> (and no sizes).
> When I type in ls -lk, I get a long listing -- but it isn't using K, but
> bytes.
>
> :-(.
>
> Why k no worky?
Since coreutils 8.15 the behavior was changed to be more consistent
with other systems and POSIX:
http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commit;h=448718
thanks,
Pádraig.
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/01
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?,
Pádraig Brady <=
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Linda A. Walsh, 2013/06/01
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/01
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/01
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Eric Blake, 2013/06/01
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/01
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/02
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/02
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Eric Blake, 2013/06/04
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/06