[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13737: Add -h option to 'users'
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
bug#13737: Add -h option to 'users' |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:57:59 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
On 02/18/2013 01:31 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>> We HAVE documented it. We document that ALL long options can be
>> represented by an unambiguous prefix, so --h is an unambiguous prefix of
>> --help if there are no other long options beginning with h.
>
> Is it a part of POSIX, RedHat or just usual man page for 'users'? Can you
> post a proof link here?
Long options are not specified by POSIX. But they are commonly
implemented by getopt_long(), which documents the GNU-standard behavior
of recognizing unambiguous prefix. The glibc manual doesn't document
prefix handling (arguably a bug in glibc documentation, but that is not
a question for this list):
https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Getopt-Long-Options.html#Getopt-Long-Options
but the Linux man pages DO document abbreviations:
http://linux.die.net/man/3/getopt_long
"Long option names may be abbreviated if the abbreviation is unique or
is an exact match for some defined option."
Coreutils also documents it here:
https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/coreutils.html#Common-options
which is very near the beginning of 'info coreutils', our preferred
documentation system.
>
> Do I understand it right that if OpenBSD implements "-h" - you'll copy?
Yes, if there is existing practice of burning '-h' to mean help in some
other implementation, then the option cannot be standardized by POSIX to
mean anything else, so we might as well also make it mean help. But we
aren't going to lead the pack on burning a short option for something
like help.
> And what if OpenBSD says that "unless GNU implementation"?
Good for them. Burning short option letters is not something you want
to do lightly.
>
> I don't get why GNU development and usability features should depend on
> non-GNU implementation?
GNU prefers long options. We support short options insofar as standards
documents and compatibility dictate, but don't let short options drive
development.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- bug#13737: Add -h option to 'users', anatoly techtonik, 2013/02/18
- bug#13737: Add -h option to 'users', Jim Meyering, 2013/02/18
- bug#13737: Add -h option to 'users', Bob Proulx, 2013/02/18
- bug#13737: Add -h option to 'users', anatoly techtonik, 2013/02/18
- bug#13737: Add -h option to 'users', anatoly techtonik, 2013/02/18
- bug#13737: Add -h option to 'users', Eric Blake, 2013/02/18
- bug#13737: Add -h option to 'users', anatoly techtonik, 2013/02/18
- bug#13737: Add -h option to 'users', Eric Blake, 2013/02/18