bug-coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#12626: Bug?: dd limited to <2G read size (2G-8K) on 64 bit machine?


From: Linda Walsh
Subject: bug#12626: Bug?: dd limited to <2G read size (2G-8K) on 64 bit machine?
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 10:17:42 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100228 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666

I tried using gvim instead... ;-)

I found:
 /* Warn about partial reads if bs=SIZE is given and iflag=fullblock
    is not, and if counting or skipping bytes or using direct I/O.
    This helps to avoid confusion with miscounts, and to avoid issues
    with direct I/O on GNU/Linux.  */
 warn_partial_read =
   (! (conversions_mask & C_TWOBUFS) && ! (input_flags & O_FULLBLOCK)
    && (skip_records
        || (0 < max_records && max_records < (uintmax_t) -1)
        || (input_flags | output_flags) & O_DIRECT));


------------
I'm not doing conversions and didn't have fullblock set.
I'm not skipping records
input has o_direct set...

but the troublesome line:
        || (0 < max_records && max_records < (uintmax_t) -1)
I asked to copy 1,2 or 4 records

uintmax -1 =  0xffff fffe --- I don't understand, if max_records is >0
and less than ~4G-1, set this flag?

I'm assuming it's a flag to display the message or not, as I know it doesn't display the message most of the time...

Is that right uintmax?   or should that be an unsigned long int max?



But I don't think that's the root cause of what I am seeing. But that statement doesn't look right.... It acts more like something (maybe not dd), is running with a 32-bit word size.

ldd shows dd linking with lib64 targets:

 ldd dd
       linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff6d5ff000)
       librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x0000003001800000)
       libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003000400000)
       libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x0000003001000000)
       /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003000000000)

---
Does dd have a 32-bit limit on numb blocks?




Paul Eggert wrote:
On 10/11/2012 08:11 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
I find that if I try to use a read size of > (2G-8K), I get partial read errors.

My guess is that it's your kernel, or maybe your
file system, and not dd per se.  Try running 'strace'.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]