[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#10819: [BUG][RM]
|
From: |
Voelker, Bernhard |
|
Subject: |
bug#10819: [BUG][RM] |
|
Date: |
Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:52:57 +0100 |
tags 10819 fixed
thanks
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
> > Good point.
> > That means, the info page could be enhanced to mention that
> > special case (see below).
> ...
> > Subject: [PATCH] doc: document 'rm -f' better
> Thanks. I've applied that with these tweaks:
Even better, thank you.
Marking it as done.
Have a nice day,
Berny
- bug#10819: [BUG][RM], address@hidden, 2012/02/15
- bug#10819: [BUG][RM], Eric Blake, 2012/02/15
- bug#10819: [BUG][RM], Davide Brini, 2012/02/16
- bug#10819: [BUG][RM], Jim Meyering, 2012/02/16
- bug#10819: [BUG][RM], Voelker, Bernhard, 2012/02/16
- bug#10819: [BUG][RM], Jim Meyering, 2012/02/16
- bug#10819: [BUG][RM], Voelker, Bernhard, 2012/02/16
- bug#10819: [BUG][RM], Jim Meyering, 2012/02/16
- bug#10819: [BUG][RM],
Voelker, Bernhard <=
- bug#10819: [BUG][RM], Eric Blake, 2012/02/16
- bug#10819: [BUG][RM], Jim Meyering, 2012/02/16
- bug#10819: [BUG][RM], Stefano Lattarini, 2012/02/16
- bug#10819: [BUG][RM], Eric Blake, 2012/02/16
- bug#10819: [BUG][RM], Philip Rowlands, 2012/02/16
- bug#10819: POSIX will say running "rm -f" with no argument is OK, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/02/16