bug-coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#10619: BUG compilando install.c


From: Eric Blake
Subject: bug#10619: BUG compilando install.c
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:42:25 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0

tag 10619 notabug
thanks

On 01/26/2012 07:09 PM, Lobo Oscuro wrote:

Apologies that I am replying in English; while I can mostly read
Spanish, I am not fluent enough to compose a reply in that language.

> 
>   Se necesita el ejecutable ./install pero mirando los pasos en ningun 
> momento compila install.c y no se obtiene el ejecutable para ser instalado en 
> /usr/local/bin/install , se necesita los ejecutables ./install y 
> ./install-info para continuar con la instalacion del mismo paquete:
> 
>  /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ./coreutils.info '/usr/local/share/info'
>  install-info --info-dir='/usr/local/share/info' 
> '/usr/local/share/info/coreutils.info'

Those two command lines do _not_ imply that you need ./install nor
./install-info (that is, executables found in your current working
directory), but rather the version of 'install' and 'install-info' as
found via a $PATH search.  You probably never want to run './install' or
'./install-info', but should instead run 'install' (for a PATH search)
or '/usr/bin/install' (for an absolute path of the installed binary).

> 
>   Mirando la documentacion no dice nada relacionado con eso. Pero estoy 
> seguro que asi como ese hay muchos archivos que no son compilados porque hay 
> mas codigos fuentes que ejecutables compilados.
>                                         

I'm assuming that you are using a GNU/Linux system, in which case it is
safe to assume that these two programs (install is from coreutils,
install-info is from info) are pre-installed and that your PATH is
probably already set up to use them.  There's generally no need to
rebuild a local copy of either of these applications into your current
working directory.

I will go ahead and close out this bug report, but we can reopen it if
you can provide more information relevant to the situation, or even a
suggestion of where to make a documentation patch that would have helped
you out in the first place.

-- 
Eric Blake   address@hidden    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]