[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#10369: coreutils: [PATCH] chmod.c usage() order items alphabetically
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
bug#10369: coreutils: [PATCH] chmod.c usage() order items alphabetically |
|
Date: |
Mon, 26 Dec 2011 02:25:33 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0 |
On 12/26/11 02:20, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> chcon, chgrp need the same adjustment.
> Note I'd prefer to keep -R and -v together
> as they're more general than --ref and
> can use the same translations.
If we're going to list options in some order
than alphabetically (which often makes sense),
shouldn't -c, -f, and -v be kept together?
This would be for the same reason that --no-preserve-root
and --preserve-root are kept together: they're related
options.
- bug#10369: coreutils: [PATCH] chmod.c usage() order items alphabetically, Jari Aalto, 2011/12/26
- bug#10369: coreutils: [PATCH] chmod.c usage() order items alphabetically, Pádraig Brady, 2011/12/26
- bug#10369: coreutils: [PATCH] chmod.c usage() order items alphabetically,
Paul Eggert <=
- bug#10369: coreutils: [PATCH] chmod.c usage() order items alphabetically, Pádraig Brady, 2011/12/26
- bug#10369: coreutils: [PATCH] doc: homologize ch{con, grp, mod, own} option descriptions, Pádraig Brady, 2011/12/26
- bug#10369: coreutils: [PATCH] doc: homologize ch{con, grp, mod, own} option descriptions, Jim Meyering, 2011/12/26
- bug#10369: coreutils: [PATCH] doc: homologize ch{con, grp, mod, own} option descriptions, Pádraig Brady, 2011/12/26