[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9718: bugs in `date` command?
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
bug#9718: bugs in `date` command? |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 21:44:31 +0200 |
severity 9718 wishlist
tags 9718 + notabug
thanks
Eric Blake wrote:
...
> As currently coded in the grammar, this is correct. But if someone
> were willing to put forth the effort to update parsedate.y, as well as
> enhance the testsuite to cover things, it might be possible to improve
> the grammar to accept both common meanings of "second" depending on
> the context where it appears compared to the rest of the date.
Just in case, I've marked this as "wishlist".
If you're interested, please add it to TODO.
If not, please close this.