[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#8676: ls --si --human-readable, MB vs M
|
From: |
Jim Meyering |
|
Subject: |
bug#8676: ls --si --human-readable, MB vs M |
|
Date: |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:04:00 +0200 |
tags 8676 + notabug
thanks
Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 05/16/11 01:48, Peggy Russell wrote:
>> Shouldn't the `ls -l --si` output (#2 or #4) be display as 60MB vs 60M
>
> That would be more consistent, yes. But it would also take up an extra
> column of output, and those columns are precious.
Just marking this issue as "done".
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#8676: ls --si --human-readable, MB vs M,
Jim Meyering <=