[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rebased patches?
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: rebased patches? |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 01:16:28 +0200 |
Bo Borgerson <address@hidden> wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Also, I made some syntactic changes to fit with my policy
>> preferences (no ">" operators, and adjusted "const" placement):
>
> Thanks Jim.
>
> BTW - Do you have these policy preferences collected somewhere? I don't
> remember seeing some of them in the general GNU standards document.
> If they are coreutils-specific would it make sense to have a section in
> HACKING (or maybe a dedicated standards.txt supplement) to explain them?
Those two are my own preferences.
Yes, mentioning them in HACKING is on my list.
I prefer < to >, and caught the bug from Paul.
I'm not alone:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/3903/focus=4126
I'll dig up justification for my const placement preference later.