[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PDT timezone bug in GNU coreutils "date" v6.9
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
Re: PDT timezone bug in GNU coreutils "date" v6.9 |
|
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:54:45 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Philip Rowlands <address@hidden> writes:
> However, in the context of getdate's grammar, "EST" unambiguously
> means -0500, no?
No. Not necessarily. It depends on your TZ setting. It might
reasonably mean +1000, for example. One cannot rely on "EST" meaning
-0500. Nor can one rely on "PDT" meaning -0700; that can also be
overridden by a TZ setting.
- Re: PDT timezone bug in GNU coreutils "date" v6.9, (continued)
- Re: PDT timezone bug in GNU coreutils "date" v6.9, gmane, 2008/01/16
- Re: PDT timezone bug in GNU coreutils "date" v6.9, Paul Eggert, 2008/01/17
- Re: PDT timezone bug in GNU coreutils "date" v6.9, Bob Proulx, 2008/01/17
- Re: PDT timezone bug in GNU coreutils "date" v6.9, Bob Proulx, 2008/01/17
- Re: PDT timezone bug in GNU coreutils "date" v6.9, Philip Rowlands, 2008/01/17
- Re: PDT timezone bug in GNU coreutils "date" v6.9, Bob Proulx, 2008/01/17
- Re: PDT timezone bug in GNU coreutils "date" v6.9, Philip Rowlands, 2008/01/18
- Re: PDT timezone bug in GNU coreutils "date" v6.9, Bob Proulx, 2008/01/27
- Re: PDT timezone bug in GNU coreutils "date" v6.9, James Youngman, 2008/01/28
- Re: PDT timezone bug in GNU coreutils "date" v6.9,
Paul Eggert <=