[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
chmod 0755 behaves like chmod 755
From: |
Jason Pepas |
Subject: |
chmod 0755 behaves like chmod 755 |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:31:50 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070420) |
I think I might have found a bug regarding the new behavior of chmod
(regarding the preservation of setuig, setgid, etc) in coreutils-6.9.
My understanding is that the new behavior should preserve these bits if
they are not explicitly specified, and this appears to work correctly:
$ mkdir foo
$ ls -ld foo
drwxr-xr-x 2 cell dept 4096 Oct 2 13:46 foo
$ chmod g+s foo
$ ls -ld foo
drwxr-sr-x 2 cell dept 4096 Oct 2 13:46 foo
$ chmod 755 foo
$ ls -ld foo
drwxr-sr-x 2 cell dept 4096 Oct 2 13:46 foo
However, the problem exists for the case where a user *does* explicitly
specify what those bits should be. chmod respects those bits while
setting them:
$ mkdir foo
$ ls -ld foo
drwxr-xr-x 2 cell dept 4096 Oct 2 13:40 foo
$ chmod 2755 foo
$ ls -ld foo
drwxr-sr-x 2 cell dept 4096 Oct 2 13:40 foo
but ignores them when the user attempts to clear them:
$ chmod 0755 foo
$ ls -ld foo
drwxr-sr-x 2 cell dept 4096 Oct 2 13:40 foo
However, using the symbolic instead of octal notation works correctly:
$ chmod g-s foo
$ ls -ld foo
drwxr-xr-x 2 cell dept 4096 Oct 2 13:40 foo
Is there any way to clear the setgid bit using octal notation?
-jason
- chmod 0755 behaves like chmod 755,
Jason Pepas <=
- Re: chmod 0755 behaves like chmod 755, Andreas Schwab, 2007/10/02
- Re: chmod 0755 behaves like chmod 755, Jason Pepas, 2007/10/03
- Re: chmod 0755 behaves like chmod 755, Paul Eggert, 2007/10/03
- Re: chmod 0755 behaves like chmod 755, Mike Frysinger, 2007/10/03
- Re: chmod 0755 behaves like chmod 755, Paul Eggert, 2007/10/04
- Re: chmod 0755 behaves like chmod 755, Evan Hunt, 2007/10/04
- Re: chmod 0755 behaves like chmod 755, Paul Eggert, 2007/10/04
- Re: chmod 0755 behaves like chmod 755, Mike Frysinger, 2007/10/05
- Re: chmod 0755 behaves like chmod 755, Paul Eggert, 2007/10/05
Re: chmod 0755 behaves like chmod 755, Bob Proulx, 2007/10/03