[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in resolve?
From: |
Wil Cooley |
Subject: |
Re: Bug in resolve? |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 18:49:00 -0700 |
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 22:03 +0200, Pip Oomen wrote:
> Is the following a known issue? Or is there something wrong in my
> configuration?
Kinda both. The ":" is the list separator, so the 'options timeout' and
'1' are taken as separate configuration items and since the latter is a
number, it is assumed to be a nameserver address. Eric Sorenson
prepared a patch for me to add a '${colon}', which would let you use
'options timeout${colon}1', but unfortunately I never got around to
testing it and I don't think he submitted it. You can redefine the list
separator (but you'll also need to choose one that you don't expect to
use in a string and you'll have to change any existing lists).
OTOH, you can just create a site-wide resolv.conf and use 'copy' to
distribute it. I started using 'resolve', but it seemed to be largely
redundant and I had a few problems keeping it up (not to mention kept
having to refer to the manual for yet another thing), so I just dumped
it and used 'copy'.
Honestly, I don't think 'resolve' really needs to exist, unless there's
something really special that I'm missing. From what I can tell, it's
just more syntactical baggage, like many of the directives. Looking
over the cfagent directives listed in the reference manual, there are
33, 15 of which I actually use. Another 4 or 5 I could imagine using.
But then again, I'm managing fewer than 20 machines over a couple
different customer sites; maybe if I managed a larger individual network
that other 1/3 would seem more useful.
Wil
--
Wil Cooley address@hidden
Naked Ape Consulting http://nakedape.cc
* * * * Linux, UNIX, Networking and Security Solutions * * * *
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part