Re: Testsuite for GNU Bison 3.6 fails bistromathic: FAIL: 13

[Akim Demaille]

Hi Klaus,

Please, let's stay on bug-bison.

> Le 8 mai 2020 à 20:59, Klaus Dittrich <address@hidden> a écrit :
> 
> Am 2020-05-08 um 16:22 schrieb Akim Demaille:
>>> Le 8 mai 2020 à 15:08, Klaus Dittrich <address@hidden> a écrit :
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Testsuite for GNU Bison 3.6 fails on
>>> 
>>> bistromathic: PASS: 12
>>> checking for kernel name
>>> bistromathic: FAIL: 13
>> Hi Klaus,
>> Thanks for the report!
>>> bistromathic: FAIL: 13
>>> bistromathic: input:
>>>   (1+
>>> bistromathic: expected output:
>>>   > (1+
>>>   (       -       atan    cos     exp     ln      number  sin     sqrt
>>>   > (1+
>>>   >
>>>   err: ^G1.4: syntax error: expected - or ( or number or function or 
>>> variable before end of file
>>> bistromathic: effective output:
>>>   > (1+
>>>   (       -       atan    cos     exp     ln      number  sin     sqrt
>>>   > (1+
>>>   >
>>>   err: 1.4: syntax error: expected - or ( or number or function or variable 
>>> before end of file
>> Can you tell me more about your machine please?  Is it running Windows?
>> And what does "uname -s" report.
>> Thanks in advance!
> 
> 
> Akim,
> 
> it is a Linux machine uname -s returns "Linux",
> uname -a "Linux df1tl 5.6.11 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed May 6 12:52:43 CEST 2020 
> x86_64 GNU/Linux"
> 
> I have GNU bash, Version 5.0.17(1)-release (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu),
> gettext-0.20.2, glibc-glibc-2.31,  bc-2.6.1 and readline-8.0 installed.
> 
> locale returns
> 
> LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
> LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8
> LC_NUMERIC=C
> LC_TIME=C
> LC_COLLATE=C
> LC_MONETARY=de_DE.UTF-8
> LC_MESSAGES=de_DE.UTF-8
> LC_PAPER="de_DE.UTF-8"
> LC_NAME="de_DE.UTF-8"
> LC_ADDRESS="de_DE.UTF-8"
> LC_TELEPHONE="de_DE.UTF-8"
> LC_MEASUREMENT="de_DE.UTF-8"
> LC_IDENTIFICATION="de_DE.UTF-8"

I'm also using readline 8.0.  But in your case it does not seem
to ring the bell when trying to get some completion.  Maybe it's a
configuration issue.

When I run bistromatic by hand, and type "1+<TAB>", I get a beep
and no completion suggestion.  When I hit <TAB> a second time, I
don't get a beep but I have the completion suggestions (and likewise
for any additional <TAB>.

What do you have?

Would you have something like "set bell-style none" in your ~/.inputrc,
or maybe /usr/local/etc/inputrc, or /etc/inputrc.

Or maybe "show-all-if-ambiguous", or "show-all-if-unmodified".


Could run again "make check" please, but with an empty INPUTRC environment
variable:

    $ INPUTRC= make check

Thanks!