bug-bison
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bison 3.5 released [stable]


From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: Bison 3.5 released [stable]
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 17:17:18 +0100


> Le 13 déc. 2019 à 19:37, Dennis Clarke <address@hidden> a écrit :
> 
> On 12/13/19 12:57 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>> On 13 Dec 2019, at 18:15, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> 
>>> https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bison/bison-3.5.tar.xz
> 
> Also sadly, on ye old Solaris 10 sparcv9 I see :
> 
> FAIL: examples/c/reccalc/reccalc
> ================================
> 
> reccalc: PASS: 1
> reccalc: PASS: 2
> reccalc: PASS: 3
> reccalc: PASS: 4
> .././examples/c/reccalc/reccalc.test: line 37: seq: command not found
> reccalc: FAIL: 5 (expected status: 0, effective: 1)
> syntax error, unexpected end-of-line, expecting + or - or number or string
> reccalc: PASS: 6
> reccalc: PASS: 7
> FAIL examples/c/reccalc/reccalc.test (exit status: 1)

Yep, as you saw, it's a rather common tool.  I'll install the following thingy, 
so that we no longer have this problem if seq is not available.  Cheers!

commit 0c0baa50955acf236269157c34fc64f443942b3d
Author: Akim Demaille <address@hidden>
Date:   Sat Dec 14 17:11:52 2019 +0100

    tests: don't fail if seq is no available
    
    As is the case on Solaris.
    Reported by Dennis Clarke.
    https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bison/2019-12/msg00011.html
    
    * examples/c/reccalc/reccalc.test: Skip if there is no seq.

diff --git a/examples/c/reccalc/reccalc.test b/examples/c/reccalc/reccalc.test
index 5d95b4e0..a4b2591c 100644
--- a/examples/c/reccalc/reccalc.test
+++ b/examples/c/reccalc/reccalc.test
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
 # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
 # along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
 
+seq 0 >/dev/null || exit 77
+
 cat >input <<EOF
 1+2*3
 EOF




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]