Re: (non)Use of C++ 11 constructs in skeleton

[Akim Demaille]

> Le 19 mai 2019 à 12:58, Frank Heckenbach <address@hidden> a écrit :
> 
> Akim Demaille wrote:
> 
>>> Le 19 mai 2019 à 11:02, Hans Åberg <address@hidden> a écrit :
>>> 
>>> Also a spelling error: copiable.
>> 
>> I'm installing this.  Thanks a lot Hans!
>> 
>>    fix: use copiable, not copyable
> 
> Am I missing something? Seems like "copyable" is a valid alternative
> form:
> 
>  https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/copiable
> 
> and commonly used in C++:
> 
>  https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/is_trivially_copyable

Bummer.  Reading 'copiable' felt so weird...  But the dictionary I checked had 
it, and not 'copyable'.

I'll revert that for 3.4.1 then...

Thanks Frank!