[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bison.1 in version control?
|
From: |
Eric Blake |
|
Subject: |
bison.1 in version control? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:38:33 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080421 Thunderbird/2.0.0.14 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
It looks like bison generally tries to avoid generated files in version
control (for example, configure or Makefile.in). Any reason that
doc/bison.1 is an exception to this rule? Also, I noticed that
.prev-version is NOT in version control, which means builds start out with
this message:
cat: .prev-version: No such file or directory
In comparison, coreutils keeps .prev-version under control, while using a
copy of help2man to avoid keeping .1 under control.
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkh4CxkACgkQ84KuGfSFAYBeUACcDwmOmCTLZeIeIIm49UZnKcQz
W40An09xixXQNibuAPbdJNNNAjGSXv8/
=EmAH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- bison.1 in version control?,
Eric Blake <=
Re: bison.1 in version control?, Akim Demaille, 2008/07/22