Re: Per-type %destructor?

[Bart Samwel]

Hi Joel,

Joel E. Denny wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Bart Samwel wrote:
>
> > I've just picked up bison 2.1, and I read in the manual that feedback on the
> > %destructor feature was wanted. I do have one issue with the way it is
> > implemented, and I didn't find any discussions in the archives that mentioned
> > this, so here I am to report. If this has already been resolved or rejected
> > earlier, please forgive my ignorance. :-)
> >
> > My issue with the 2.1 %destructor feature is that destructors are only
> > specifiable on a per-symbol basis, while I would like to specify them per
> > *type*.
>
> This has been discussed briefly before, and I agree with you.  At least 
> one other developer agreed at the time, and there were no objections, so I 
> think it will happen eventually.

Great! I'll start using the feature as it is then, and migrate to the 
"typewide" version when it appears.

> Thanks for the feedback.

Thanks for making my life easier. :-)

Cheers,
Bart