Re: too many warnings from Bison CVS for Pike

[Joel E. Denny]

On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Hans Aberg wrote:

> On 21 Feb 2006, at 19:34, Joel E. Denny wrote:
> 
> > If this usage is fine, then I wonder how "lalr1.cc" supports non-POD types
> > more than "yacc.c".  A footnote in the same section says that
> > `pseudo-unions' may alleviate this need for pointers in the future.

[snip]

> Then the semantic type is a non-POD class

OK, so you #define YYSTYPE, I take it.  It seems that this usage is 
addressed in "lalr1.cc", which I should have checked before.  Akim, should 
a sentence about this usage be added to section `10.1.2 C++ Semantic 
Values'?

Joel