Re: %destructor feedback

[Joel E. Denny]

On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Akim Demaille wrote:

> >>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>  >> - we desire that in all the skeletons no $n is ever freed from an
>  >> "active" rule, even if we leave it using YYACCEPT, YYERROR, or
>  >> YYABORT.
> 
>  > Yes, that sounds right.
> 
> Well, AFAICS that's already the behavior in glr.c, isn't it?
> Otherwise I missed the bit of code that is wrong.

As I recall, it was just YYABORT and YYACCEPT in yacc.c that was a 
problem.  When I looked at the time, glr.c seemed fine.

Joel