[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: %destructor feedback
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: %destructor feedback |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Dec 2005 03:34:04 -0500 (EST) |
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Paul Eggert wrote:
> "Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > it seems that we need a band-aid that will at least stop the
> > bleeding we've actually *seen* so far.
>
> How about if we dump YYUSE entirely?
That would make my parse param structs happy.
> /*ARGSUSEDn*/ before any function that might not use one of its
> arguments whose number is n or less.
...n or more for my lint. Thus /*ARGSUSED0*/ allows all args to go unused
with no warnings.
Joel
- Re: %destructor feedback, (continued)
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/06
- Re: %destructor feedback, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/06
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/06
- Re: %destructor feedback, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/07
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/07
- Re: %destructor feedback, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/07
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/07
- Re: %destructor feedback, Tzvetan Mikov, 2005/12/08
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/08
- Re: %destructor feedback, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/08
- Re: %destructor feedback,
Joel E. Denny <=
- 'lint' fixes for Bison-generated parsers, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/09
- Re: 'lint' fixes for Bison-generated parsers, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/12
- Re: 'lint' fixes for Bison-generated parsers, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/12
- Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/07
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/07
- Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/07
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/07
- Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/19
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/19
- Re: %destructor feedback, Frank Heckenbach, 2005/12/06