Re: %destructor feedback

[Paul Eggert]

"Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:

> Did you try my static global variable solution?  It worked for my
> tests, but again it should probably be tested with other lints.

If you're talking about this one:

  static int yyunused;
  #define YYUSE(e) yyunused = (int*) &(e) && yyunused

then I suspect it will also run afoul of lint implementations that
deduce that &(e) can never be null, and print a warning.  Also, I
don't like having an unnecessary static variable around.  Also, it
won't work if e is declared to be a register, as you can't take
addresses of registers.