[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: %destructor feedback
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: %destructor feedback |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Dec 2005 18:58:17 -0500 (EST) |
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Akim Demaille wrote:
"Paul" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
> "Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:
>> However, I just noticed the current YYUSE definition doesn't allow the
>> argument to be a struct instance. Paul, Akim, is this intentional?
> Yes and no. If we could easily implement it with struct instances we
> would. But so far we haven't needed it, and doing it would be a pain.
I've needed it in C++, so there it uses the traditional cast to void.
Because of the new b4_parse_param_use, I'm now finding that some of my
existing bison specs need it for C or I get a compile error. Below is a
test case demonstrating the problem. What was wrong with the cast to void?
Joel
%{
#include <stdio.h>
struct ParseParam { int i; };
static void yyerror (struct ParseParam, char const *);
static int yylex (void);
%}
%parse-param { struct ParseParam parse_param }
%%
start: ;
%%
static void
yyerror (struct ParseParam parse_param, char const *msg)
{
fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", msg);
}
static int
yylex (void)
{
return 0;
}
int
main (void)
{
struct ParseParam parse_param;
return yyparse (parse_param);
}
- Re: %destructor feedback,
Joel E. Denny <=
- Re: %destructor feedback, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/03
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/03
- Re: %destructor feedback, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/05
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/05
- Re: %destructor feedback, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/06
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/06
- Re: %destructor feedback, Paul Eggert, 2005/12/06
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/06