Re: [PATCH] Fix variadic declaration of yyerror() and yylex() function prototypes

[Paul Eggert]

Jeannot Langlois <address@hidden> writes:

> Are these declarations another possible mistake by the test case
> writer?  Shouldn't these test case use "static int yyerror(...)" since
> they assert "%yacc" ?  (Should I change these test cases to use "void"
> too?  Or maybe there's something I didn't get...?)

The idea here, as I understand it, is to change Bison so that it
assumes "int" when in Yacc mode and "void" otherwise.  If so, then
yes, we should fix the test cases to agree with this new convention.