[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: POSIX and reduce/reduce conflicts
|
From: |
Akim Demaille |
|
Subject: |
Re: POSIX and reduce/reduce conflicts |
|
Date: |
08 Apr 2002 23:24:02 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) |
>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: Akim Demaille <address@hidden> Date: 08 Apr 2002 19:20:17
>> +0200
>> what does POSIX say about reduce/reduce conflicts?
Paul> I'm not sure what you're looking for here, but POSIX says that
Paul> yacc must report reduce/reduce conflicts (as well as
Paul> shift/reduce conflicts) to stderr in an unspecified format.
Paul> Also, when there is a reduce/reduce conflict, yacc must reduce
Paul> by the grammar rule that occurs earliest in the input.
So using the highest priority is a POSIX violation. I guess it is
time for POSIXLY_CORRECT_HARDER :)
- Re: User Token Numbers, (continued)
- Re: User Token Numbers, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/08
- Re: User Token Numbers, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/08
- Re: User Token Numbers, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/08
- Re: User Token Numbers, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/09
- Re: User Token Numbers, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/09
- Re: User Token Numbers, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/10
- Re: User Token Numbers, Hans Aberg, 2002/04/10
- Re: User Token Numbers, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/10
Re: User Token Numbers, Florian Krohm, 2002/04/08
Re: POSIX and reduce/reduce conflicts, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/08
- Re: POSIX and reduce/reduce conflicts,
Akim Demaille <=
Re: POSIX and reduce/reduce conflicts, Hans Aberg, 2002/04/09