Re: Bison 1.30f

[Hans Aberg]

At 14:36 +0100 2001/12/20, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>If you want to have a bison that genrates code adapted for the variety of
>C++ you are using then I suppose you could get that by means of some flag
>machinery but in the default case I think that bison should target C89 for
>some years to come. If there should be any secondary target languages then
>I think C99 is a good candidate.

Two possible ways mentioned in this list are to enhance the skeleton file
language, making it easier to write different skeleton files, and adding
support for writing out the info in XML, so that skeleton files can be
written using XML tools.

  Hans Aberg