[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gprofng/32241] gprofng can't be built with LTO
From: |
sam at gentoo dot org |
Subject: |
[Bug gprofng/32241] gprofng can't be built with LTO |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Oct 2024 09:23:46 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32241
--- Comment #13 from Sam James <sam at gentoo dot org> ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #12)
> That works (doesn't fix the runtime test issue though, so I guess that's
> something different). Thanks.
... which is obvious now I think about it, given the other bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug ld/32241] Binutils can't build itself with -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects, (continued)
- [Bug ld/32241] Binutils can't build itself with -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects, sam at gentoo dot org, 2024/10/06
- [Bug ld/32241] Binutils can't build itself with -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2024/10/06
- [Bug ld/32241] Binutils can't build itself with -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects, sam at gentoo dot org, 2024/10/06
- [Bug ld/32241] Binutils can't build itself with -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects (fails in gprofng, dbe_memmgr.c:(.text+0x11): undefined reference to `get_prog_name'), sam at gentoo dot org, 2024/10/06
- [Bug ld/32241] Binutils can't build itself with -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects (fails in gprofng, dbe_memmgr.c:(.text+0x11): undefined reference to `get_prog_name'), hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2024/10/06
- [Bug gprofng/32241] gprofng can't be built with LTO, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2024/10/06
- [Bug gprofng/32241] gprofng can't be built with LTO, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2024/10/06
- [Bug gprofng/32241] gprofng can't be built with LTO, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2024/10/06
- [Bug gprofng/32241] gprofng can't be built with LTO, address@hidden, 2024/10/06
- [Bug gprofng/32241] gprofng can't be built with LTO, sam at gentoo dot org, 2024/10/06
- [Bug gprofng/32241] gprofng can't be built with LTO,
sam at gentoo dot org <=
- [Bug gprofng/32241] gprofng can't be built with LTO, lantw44 at gmail dot com, 2024/10/06
- [Bug gprofng/32241] gprofng can't be built with LTO, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2024/10/16