[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bash not portable to C23
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: Bash not portable to C23 |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Mar 2023 15:03:37 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 |
On 3/24/23 1:36 AM, Oğuz İsmail Uysal wrote:
On 3/24/23 4:49 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
a strict C23 compiler
Does such a compiler exist? Is C23 even published yet?
It's not, but the latest drafts are pretty much final, especially with
respect to new features and behavior changes.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
- Bash not portable to C23, Paul Eggert, 2023/03/23
- Re: Bash not portable to C23, Lawrence Velázquez, 2023/03/23
- Re: Bash not portable to C23, Paul Eggert, 2023/03/23
- Re: Bash not portable to C23, Sam James, 2023/03/24
- Re: Bash not portable to C23, Chet Ramey, 2023/03/24
- Re: Bash not portable to C23, Sam James, 2023/03/24
- Re: Bash not portable to C23, Oğuz İsmail Uysal, 2023/03/24
- Re: Bash not portable to C23,
Chet Ramey <=
- Re: Bash not portable to C23, Chet Ramey, 2023/03/24
- Re: Bash not portable to C23, Paul Eggert, 2023/03/26
- Re: Bash not portable to C23, Chet Ramey, 2023/03/27