[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bash conditional expressions
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: bash conditional expressions |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:23:17 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.1 |
On 11/12/21 4:36 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
Could you please restore the Fedora 32 behaviour? Someone must have read
the bash manual a little too precise, because now the statement only
returns true when a 'touch -a test' is given and not when a 'touch -am
test' is given.
As I understand it, -N stands for NEW and therefore should return a true
when either a 'touch -a test' or a 'touch -am test' is given.
Why do you think `touch -am', which sets the atime and mtime to the same
value, should make -N true?
If test -N is a strict test that mtime > atime, it is working correctly
and you have managed to defeat it by setting atime == mtimne.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
- Re: bash conditional expressions, (continued)
Re: bash conditional expressions, Chet Ramey, 2021/11/15
Re: bash conditional expressions, Dale R. Worley, 2021/11/14
Re: bash conditional expressions,
Chet Ramey <=
Re: bash conditional expressions, Chet Ramey, 2021/11/17