[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Squiggly heredoc - new feature request
From: |
Lawrence Velázquez |
Subject: |
Re: Squiggly heredoc - new feature request |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Aug 2021 04:02:33 -0400 |
> On Aug 31, 2021, at 3:16 AM, Přemysl Šťastný <p-w@stty.cz> wrote:
>
> I didn't realize yesterday, that ksh93 is not a nick name, but ksh version
> 93. :D
Sort of.
> So it would be okey with you, if I try to implement it using <<#?
The bash maintainer (who is not me) hasn’t yet indicated whether this is
something he’d be interested in pursuing. The behavior is underspecified (ksh
does not blindly remove all leading whitespace), and there are still
compatibility concerns (as I mentioned earlier, there is currently at least one
circumstance in which ‘<<#’ is valid syntax).
> Is there any git repo of bash?
Yes.
https://savannah.gnu.org/git/?group=bash
--
vq
Sent from my iPhone
- Squiggly heredoc - new feature request, Přemysl Šťastný, 2021/08/30
- Re: Squiggly heredoc - new feature request, Jesse Hathaway, 2021/08/30
- Re: Squiggly heredoc - new feature request, Přemysl Šťastný, 2021/08/31
- Re: Squiggly heredoc - new feature request, Jesse Hathaway, 2021/08/31
- Re: Squiggly heredoc - new feature request, Oğuz, 2021/08/31
Re: Squiggly heredoc - new feature request, felix, 2021/08/31