|
From: | |
Subject: | Re: . and .. are included where they were excluded before |
Date: | Tue, 26 Jan 2021 21:14:56 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1 |
On 26/01/2021 21:13, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 1/26/21 4:00 PM, kfm@plushkava.net wrote:One example is that gregrwm claims the following outcome for 5.0.17(1) in Ubuntu 20.04:-$ echo @(?|.?) #. and .. are included . .. a .bNote that '.' is said to be among the pathnames matched. I don't see how this can possibly be the case. I'm hoping that it was merely a case of making a mistake in the course of performing the tests and assembling the results.That's the thing I said I would look at in my initial message.
Ah, I see. I'll stop fretting over it then. -- Kerin Millar
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |