[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ${!variable@operator} does not work for variables without values; i
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: ${!variable@operator} does not work for variables without values; inconsistencies between present and absent [@] for @A and @a |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Feb 2020 15:59:53 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 |
On 2/20/20 7:34 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>> Same answer as previously: maybe it should display the attributes
>> even thought the variable is unset.
>
> Yes, I think that @A, [@]@A, @a and [@]@a should work for unset variables.
OK, we'll try that and see how it works.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
- Re: ${!variable@operator} does not work for variables without values; inconsistencies between present and absent [@] for @A and @a, (continued)
Re: ${!variable@operator} does not work for variables without values; inconsistencies between present and absent [@] for @A and @a, Chet Ramey, 2020/02/20
Re: ${!variable@operator} does not work for variables without values; inconsistencies between present and absent [@] for @A and @a, Chet Ramey, 2020/02/20
Re: ${!variable@operator} does not work for variables without values; inconsistencies between present and absent [@] for @A and @a, Chet Ramey, 2020/02/20
Re: ${!variable@operator} does not work for variables without values; inconsistencies between present and absent [@] for @A and @a, Chet Ramey, 2020/02/20