Re: Patch for unicode in varnames...

[Chet Ramey]

On 6/4/17 2:47 PM, L A Walsh wrote:

> ----
>    Clarification, please, but it looks like with your
> patch below, Unicode in variable names might be fairly close
> to being achieved?  Seeing how it was done for functions,
> gave you insight into how variables could be done, yes?

No. It's not `done' for functions at all.

>    Why do you call it "terrible"?

Because it's a quick and dirty implementation that may not work in all
cases and has several obvious problems (memory leaks, etc.).


-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/