[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug: different behavior between "jobs -l" and "builtin jobs -l"
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: Bug: different behavior between "jobs -l" and "builtin jobs -l" |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:30:57 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 |
On 3/21/17 4:27 PM, Peter & Kelly Passchier wrote:
> On 22/03/2560 01:32, Martijn Dekker wrote:
>> A workaround for the original poster's problem could be:
>>
>> (unset -f jobs; unalias jobs; eval 'jobs -l') | wc
>
> 'unset -f jobs' is not guaranteed to unset jobs, it might set jobs to a
> function definition in an earlier scope..!
There are no local functions. All functions exist at the global scope.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
- Bug: different behavior between "jobs -l" and "builtin jobs -l", Hengyang Zhao, 2017/03/21
- Re: Bug: different behavior between "jobs -l" and "builtin jobs -l", Chet Ramey, 2017/03/21
- Re: Bug: different behavior between "jobs -l" and "builtin jobs -l", Hengyang Zhao, 2017/03/21
- Re: Bug: different behavior between "jobs -l" and "builtin jobs -l", Greg Wooledge, 2017/03/21
- Re: Bug: different behavior between "jobs -l" and "builtin jobs -l", Hengyang Zhao, 2017/03/21
- Re: Bug: different behavior between "jobs -l" and "builtin jobs -l", Eric Blake, 2017/03/21
- Re: Bug: different behavior between "jobs -l" and "builtin jobs -l", Martijn Dekker, 2017/03/21
- Re: Bug: different behavior between "jobs -l" and "builtin jobs -l", Greg Wooledge, 2017/03/21
- Re: Bug: different behavior between "jobs -l" and "builtin jobs -l", Chet Ramey, 2017/03/21
- Re: Bug: different behavior between "jobs -l" and "builtin jobs -l", Peter & Kelly Passchier, 2017/03/21
- Re: Bug: different behavior between "jobs -l" and "builtin jobs -l",
Chet Ramey <=