[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Variation" in Command Substitution Behaviour
From: |
Reuti |
Subject: |
Re: "Variation" in Command Substitution Behaviour |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Mar 2017 21:08:56 +0100 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am 01.03.2017 um 20:27 schrieb Geoff Hull:
> Aha! That's it. Case closed, I think.
I would say not closed, as it's still happening in 4.4.12. And if it's closed,
it should be reopened.
- -- Reuti
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
iEYEARECAAYFAli3KlgACgkQo/GbGkBRnRr7hwCfUS0Oz/24PDVd1NXWYoPhSpW+
xNwAn0E48nzFkt1HTQWuzXkaY0sOP6Vw
=n5oM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: "Variation" in Command Substitution Behaviour, Geoff Hull, 2017/03/01
- Re: "Variation" in Command Substitution Behaviour, Reuti, 2017/03/01
- Re: "Variation" in Command Substitution Behaviour, Grisha Levit, 2017/03/01
- Re: "Variation" in Command Substitution Behaviour, Reuti, 2017/03/01
- Re: "Variation" in Command Substitution Behaviour, Geoff Hull, 2017/03/01
- Re: "Variation" in Command Substitution Behaviour,
Reuti <=
- Re: "Variation" in Command Substitution Behaviour, Grisha Levit, 2017/03/01
- Re: "Variation" in Command Substitution Behaviour, Reuti, 2017/03/01
- Re: "Variation" in Command Substitution Behaviour, Chet Ramey, 2017/03/01
- Re: "Variation" in Command Substitution Behaviour, Reuti, 2017/03/01