[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: command substitution is stripping set -e from options
From: |
Christoph Gysin |
Subject: |
Re: command substitution is stripping set -e from options |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:04:04 +0300 |
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> wrote:
> I will consider adding an option to change the behavior of command
> substitution inheriting the -e option, since there doesn't seem to be
> any way to decouple this behavior from posix mode.
I added a patch:
https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/index.php?8769
Chris
--
echo mailto: NOSPAM !#$.'<*>'|sed 's. ..'|tr "<*> !#:2" org@fr33z3
- Re: command substitution is stripping set -e from options, (continued)
- Re: command substitution is stripping set -e from options, Christoph Gysin, 2015/10/08
- Re: command substitution is stripping set -e from options, Greg Wooledge, 2015/10/08
- Re: command substitution is stripping set -e from options, Christoph Gysin, 2015/10/08
- Re: command substitution is stripping set -e from options, Chet Ramey, 2015/10/08
- Re: command substitution is stripping set -e from options, Christoph Gysin, 2015/10/08
- Re: command substitution is stripping set -e from options, Chet Ramey, 2015/10/09
- Re: command substitution is stripping set -e from options, Christoph Gysin, 2015/10/08
- Re: command substitution is stripping set -e from options, Greg Wooledge, 2015/10/08
- Re: command substitution is stripping set -e from options, Christoph Gysin, 2015/10/08
- Re: command substitution is stripping set -e from options, Chet Ramey, 2015/10/10
- Re: command substitution is stripping set -e from options,
Christoph Gysin <=
- Re: command substitution is stripping set -e from options, Chet Ramey, 2015/10/15
- Re: command substitution is stripping set -e from options, Linda Walsh, 2015/10/15