[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: -e does not take effects in subshell
|
From: |
isabella parakiss |
|
Subject: |
Re: -e does not take effects in subshell |
|
Date: |
Thu, 13 Aug 2015 07:35:29 +0200 |
On 8/13/15, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
> Like it or not, it is the historical behavior standardized by POSIX. It
> is NOT intuitive, and our advice is "DON'T USE set -e - IT WON'T DO WHAT
> YOU WANT". We can't change the behavior, because it would break scripts
> that rely on the POSIX-specified behavior.
>
POSIX didn't say anything about shopt set-e-that-actually-makes-sense.
---
xoxo iza
- -e does not take effects in subshell, PRC, 2015/08/11
- Re: -e does not take effects in subshell, Greg Wooledge, 2015/08/11
- RE: -e does not take effects in subshell, PRC, 2015/08/12
- Re: -e does not take effects in subshell, Eric Blake, 2015/08/13
- Re: -e does not take effects in subshell,
isabella parakiss <=
- Re: -e does not take effects in subshell, Chet Ramey, 2015/08/13
- Re: -e does not take effects in subshell, Linda Walsh, 2015/08/18
- Re: -e does not take effects in subshell, Greg Wooledge, 2015/08/18
- Re: -e does not take effects in subshell, Linda Walsh, 2015/08/18
- Re: -e does not take effects in subshell, Andreas Schwab, 2015/08/18
- Re: -e does not take effects in subshell, Linda Walsh, 2015/08/18
- Re: -e does not take effects in subshell, Greg Wooledge, 2015/08/20
- Re: -e does not take effects in subshell, Linda Walsh, 2015/08/20
- Re: -e does not take effects in subshell, Chet Ramey, 2015/08/20
- Re: -e does not take effects in subshell, Linda Walsh, 2015/08/20