[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Usage of __P vs PARAMS in histfile.c
|
From: |
Chet Ramey |
|
Subject: |
Re: Usage of __P vs PARAMS in histfile.c |
|
Date: |
Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:13:33 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 |
On 4/8/15 11:25 AM, Evan Gates wrote:
> I tried compiling bash with musl-gcc and failed due to the __P macros
> in histfile.c
>
> While digging around it appears that __P is defined in stdc.h, but
> histfile.c indirectly includes rlstdc.h istead. rlstdc.h defines an
> identical macro with the name PARAMS instead of __P
Yes, you're right. Readline source files need to use PARAMS; bash source
files use __P (history -- don't ask).
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/