[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issues with exported functions
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: Issues with exported functions |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:35:19 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 |
On 9/24/14, 3:44 PM, lolilolicon wrote:
> Personally, I have never needed this feature. I would vote for its
> removal: It's very surprising, creates bugs, and is not very useful.
There are more things in heaven and earth that are dreamt of in your
philosophy.
> Otherwise, if this feature is going to stay (can anyone enlighten me why
> it's useful?), please document it explicitly.
Function export is documented. The exact mechanism need not be.
> As it is currently, this is a real pitfall.
Well, certainly, because there's a bug in the (unpatched) implementation.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
- Re: Issues with exported functions, (continued)
Re: Issues with exported functions, lolilolicon, 2014/09/24
Re: Issues with exported functions,
Chet Ramey <=
Re: Issues with exported functions, Linda Walsh, 2014/09/25
Re: Issues with exported functions, David A. Wheeler, 2014/09/27