[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug? "type -P xxx" returns "xxx" that isn't executable...(or readabl
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: bug? "type -P xxx" returns "xxx" that isn't executable...(or readable) |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Aug 2014 06:07:38 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.13.1 (Linux/3.14.2; KDE/4.13.1; x86_64; ; ) |
On Thu 31 Jul 2014 23:40:18 Linda Walsh wrote:
> Chet Ramey wrote:
> > type -P echo
> >
> > ls -l $(type -P echo)
> >
> >
> > If you already have `echo' in the command hash table, type -P will return
> > it, since that's what the shell will attempt to execute.
>
> ---
> It's not in the hash table, but type -P still
> returns the non-executable.
read what Chet said. type -P reflects what the shell will attempt, not what
is useful. the fact that it's not usable is irrelevant.
if you want to see if it's executable, use `[ -x ... ]`.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: bug? "type -P xxx" returns "xxx" that isn't executable...(or readable), Linda Walsh, 2014/08/01
- Re: bug? "type -P xxx" returns "xxx" that isn't executable...(or readable),
Mike Frysinger <=
- Re: bug? "type -P xxx" returns "xxx" that isn't executable...(or readable), Greg Wooledge, 2014/08/01
- Re: bug? "type -P xxx" returns "xxx" that isn't executable...(or readable), Linda Walsh, 2014/08/01
- Re: bug? "type -P xxx" returns "xxx" that isn't executable...(or readable), Chet Ramey, 2014/08/04
- Re: bug? "type -P xxx" returns "xxx" that isn't executable...(or readable), Linda Walsh, 2014/08/04
- Re: bug? "type -P xxx" returns "xxx" that isn't executable...(or readable), Chet Ramey, 2014/08/04
- Re: bug? "type -P xxx" returns "xxx" that isn't executable...(or readable), Linda Walsh, 2014/08/05
Re: bug? "type -P xxx" returns "xxx" that isn't executable...(or readable), Linda Walsh, 2014/08/01
Re: bug? "type -P xxx" returns "xxx" that isn't executable...(or readable), Chet Ramey, 2014/08/01