bug-bash (date)

Archives are refreshed every 15 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

bug-bash (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists][bug-bash info page]

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Fri Jun 28 2013 23:06:53 -0400
Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

June 28, 2013
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Chet Ramey, 23:06
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Paul Eggert, 17:22
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US vs. characterset collation rules for UTF-8, Chet Ramey, 17:16
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Eric Blake, 14:01
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Eli Zaretskii, 13:50
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US vs. characterset collation rules for UTF-8, Linda Walsh, 13:04
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Paolo Bonzini, 12:48
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Eli Zaretskii, 09:18
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Paolo Bonzini, 09:05
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Eli Zaretskii, 08:50
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Paolo Bonzini, 06:38
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Eli Zaretskii, 06:25
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US vs. characterset collation rules for UTF-8, Paolo Bonzini, 05:49
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Johannes Meixner, 05:24
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Paolo Bonzini, 05:11
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Paolo Bonzini, 05:08
- Problem inserting Unicode heavy minus sign (U+2796), Linda Walsh, 01:43
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US vs. characterset collation rules for UTF-8, Linda Walsh, 01:04
June 27, 2013
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Eli Zaretskii, 22:20
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Chet Ramey, 15:26
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Chet Ramey, 15:19
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Chet Ramey, 15:13
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Chet Ramey, 14:51
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Johannes Meixner, 13:07
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Paolo Bonzini, 10:55
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Aharon Robbins, 10:31
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Paolo Bonzini, 09:54
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Aharon Robbins, 09:46
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Paolo Bonzini, 09:27
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Paolo Bonzini, 04:48
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Aharon Robbins, 03:34
- [gnu.org #838460] bash manual correction, Adrián via RT, 03:13
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Paolo Bonzini, 03:13
June 26, 2013
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Chet Ramey, 11:00
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Pádraig Brady, 10:29
- Re: How to test if a link exists, Dave Gibson, 06:17
- Re: How to test if a link exists, Andreas Schwab, 04:11
June 25, 2013
- Re: How to test if a link exists, Mark Young, 17:09
- Re: corrupted input after size function (input that's not recorded by bash), Chet Ramey, 15:35
- Re: `printf -v foo ""` does not set foo=, Chet Ramey, 09:54
June 24, 2013
- Re: `printf -v foo ""` does not set foo=, Mike Frysinger, 18:52
- Re: Debugging memory usage, Bob Bell, 16:32
- Re: `printf -v foo ""` does not set foo=, Chet Ramey, 16:13
- Re: Debugging memory usage, John Reiser, 15:03
June 23, 2013
- Debugging memory usage, Bob Bell, 18:36
- Re: Missing "#if defined (JOB_CONTROL)" line in execute_cmd.c., Chet Ramey, 16:30
- Re: How to test if a link exists, Dave Gibson, 10:20
June 21, 2013
- Aw: How to test if a link exists, John Kearney, 17:49
- How to test if a link exists, Mark Young, 17:20
- Re: regex confusion -- not matching; think it should?, Greg Wooledge, 08:12
- Re: regex confusion -- not matching; think it should?, Dan Douglas, 03:39
June 20, 2013
- Re: regex confusion -- not matching; think it should?, Greg Wooledge, 08:09
June 19, 2013
- Re: regex confusion -- not matching; think it should?, Dan Douglas, 19:13
- Re: regex confusion -- not matching; think it should?, Linda Walsh, 13:53
- Re: regex confusion -- not matching; think it should?, DJ Mills, 13:46
- Re: regex confusion -- not matching; think it should?, Chris Down, 12:56
- Re: regex confusion -- not matching; think it should?, Greg Wooledge, 12:44
- Re: regex confusion -- not matching; think it should?, Chris Down, 12:40
- Re: regex confusion -- not matching; think it should?, DJ Mills, 12:30
- Re: Missing "#if defined (JOB_CONTROL)" line in execute_cmd.c., DJ Mills, 11:54
June 18, 2013
- Re: Aw: Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Dan Douglas, 21:35
June 17, 2013
- Re: Missing "#if defined (JOB_CONTROL)" line in execute_cmd.c., Brooks Moses, 17:15
- Missing "#if defined (JOB_CONTROL)" line in execute_cmd.c., Brooks Moses, 17:15
- Aw: Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, John Kearney, 08:33
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Greg Wooledge, 07:58
- Aw: Re: `printf -v foo ""` does not set foo=, John Kearney, 06:09
- Re: `printf -v foo ""` does not set foo=, Andreas Schwab, 03:29
- Re: `printf -v foo ""` does not set foo=, Linda Walsh, 02:33
- Re: corrupted input after size function (input that's not recorded by bash), Linda Walsh, 02:32
- Re: `printf -v foo ""` does not set foo=, Chris Down, 01:42
- `printf -v foo ""` does not set foo=, Mike Frysinger, 01:27
June 15, 2013
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Linda Walsh, 15:36
- Aw: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, John Kearney, 09:41
- Aw: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, John Kearney, 09:03
June 14, 2013
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Linda Walsh, 16:30
- Re: corrupted input after size function (input that's not recorded by bash), Linda Walsh, 10:33
- Re: corrupted input after size function (input that's not recorded by bash), Dave Gibson, 09:20
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Greg Wooledge, 08:23
- Re: corrupted input after size function (input that's not recorded by bash), Greg Wooledge, 08:18
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Dan Douglas, 07:36
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Pierre Gaston, 07:30
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Dan Douglas, 07:25
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Dan Douglas, 07:02
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Chris Down, 06:22
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Linda Walsh, 05:21
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Chris Down, 04:47
- Re: corrupted input after size function (input that's not recorded by bash), Linda Walsh, 01:42
June 13, 2013
- Re: corrupted input after size function (input that's not recorded by bash), Dennis Williamson, 22:05
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Linda Walsh, 19:51
- Re: corrupted input after size function (input that's not recorded by bash), Linda Walsh, 19:42
- Re: corrupted input after size function (input that's not recorded by bash), Chris F.A. Johnson, 17:38
- Re: corrupted input after size function (input that's not recorded by bash), Linda Walsh, 17:09
- Re: corrupted input after size function (input that's not recorded by bash), Linda Walsh, 16:45
- Re: corrupted input after size function (input that's not recorded by bash), Greg Wooledge, 16:16
- corrupted input after size function (input that's not recorded by bash), Linda Walsh, 15:58
- Re: bug batch, Eric Blake, 06:42
- Re: bug batch, Dan Douglas, 06:24
- Re: bug batch, Chris Down, 06:08
- Re: bug batch, Linda Walsh, 05:55
- bug batch, Dan Douglas, 02:14
June 12, 2013
- Re: regex confusion -- not matching; think it should?, Linda Walsh, 20:52
- regex confusion -- not matching; think it should?, Linda Walsh, 18:53
- Re: deadlock in waitchld(), Chet Ramey, 10:07
- Re: \H in PS1 adds the hostname without the domain to the prompt, Greg Wooledge, 08:38
- \H in PS1 adds the hostname without the domain to the prompt, Sascha Gaspar, 04:02
- Re: deadlock in waitchld(), Roman Rakus, 03:45
June 11, 2013
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Mike Frysinger, 13:03
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Chris Down, 03:23
- Re: noclobber vs command not found, jidanni, 01:06
June 10, 2013
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Mike Frysinger, 21:14
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Linda Walsh, 19:25
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Linda Walsh, 18:25
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Chris F.A. Johnson, 18:20
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Linda Walsh, 18:00
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, Linda Walsh, 17:44
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, Mike Frysinger, 17:30
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Chris F.A. Johnson, 11:24
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Pierre Gaston, 10:50
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Chris F.A. Johnson, 10:34
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Greg Wooledge, 10:33
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Chris F.A. Johnson, 10:23
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Greg Wooledge, 09:40
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Chet Ramey, 09:37
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Chris Down, 09:17
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Chris F.A. Johnson, 09:10
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Greg Wooledge, 08:27
- Re: noclobber vs command not found, Greg Wooledge, 08:24
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Pierre Gaston, 06:37
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Linda Walsh, 05:51
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Pierre Gaston, 02:25
June 09, 2013
- currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Linda Walsh, 17:02
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, Linda Walsh, 16:59
June 08, 2013
- Re: typeset -p & manpage on it are confusing w/rt funcs, Linda Walsh, 21:44
- noclobber vs command not found, jidanni, 20:39
June 07, 2013
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, jidanni, 19:17
- Re: Executing shell code on the signal stack, or why is this is a bad idea, Chet Ramey, 16:50
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, Chet Ramey, 16:25
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, Chet Ramey, 16:24
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, jidanni, 11:09
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, Gerard Seibert, 10:48
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, Greg Wooledge, 10:19
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, jidanni, 10:15
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, Greg Wooledge, 09:34
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, jidanni, 09:10
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, Pierre Gaston, 08:46
- don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, jidanni, 08:34
- Re: typeset -p & manpage on it are confusing w/rt funcs, Greg Wooledge, 08:16
June 06, 2013
- typeset -p & manpage on it are confusing w/rt funcs, Linda Walsh, 18:48
- Re: Executing shell code on the signal stack, or why is this is a bad idea, Chet Ramey, 11:28
- bash: read: `0': not a valid identifier: check earlier, jidanni, 09:28
- Re: Executing shell code on the signal stack, or why is this is a bad idea, Lionel Cons, 05:31
- Executing shell code on the signal stack, or why is this is a bad idea, Lionel Cons, 05:29
June 04, 2013
- Aw: Re: nested while loop doesn't work, John Kearney, 17:27
- Re: nested while loop doesn't work, Greg Wooledge, 16:16
- nested while loop doesn't work, kartikkgk, 16:07
June 01, 2013
- Re: `declare -fp` mishandles heredoc with || statement, Mike Frysinger, 22:09
- Re: `declare -fp` mishandles heredoc with || statement, Chet Ramey, 17:07
- Re: COMPREPLY scope, Raphaël Droz, 15:32

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

Mail converted by MHonArc