bug-bash (date)

Archives are refreshed every 15 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

bug-bash (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists][bug-bash info page]

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sat Mar 30 2013 22:03:05 -0400
Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

March 30, 2013
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, Chet Ramey, 22:03
- Re: completion of '../' with symlink component in CWD path, Felix, 05:06
March 29, 2013
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, Linda Walsh, 23:21
- Re: completion of '../' with symlink component in CWD path, Bob Proulx, 17:30
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, John Kearney, 14:47
- completion of '../' with symlink component in CWD path, Felix, 14:20
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, Linda Walsh, 13:53
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, John Kearney, 11:53
- off topic IFS=: read changing the global IFS, Pierre Gaston, 11:40
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, Greg Wooledge, 11:36
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, John Kearney, 11:27
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, Pierre Gaston, 11:23
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, John Kearney, 11:18
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, John Kearney, 11:10
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, Greg Wooledge, 10:30
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, John Kearney, 10:11
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, Stefano Lattarini, 09:20
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, Greg Wooledge, 07:58
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, Linda Walsh, 03:41
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, Dan Douglas, 01:18
March 28, 2013
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, Linda Walsh, 22:45
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, Greg Wooledge, 09:32
- Re: SIGTERM ignored before exec race, Pádraig Brady, 06:58
- Re: Assignments preceding "declare" affect brace and pathname expansion., Dan Douglas, 01:05
March 27, 2013
- Re: rename directory and internal pwd command., Masato Asou, 23:32
- Re: autoconf 2.69?, Chet Ramey, 19:52
- Re: autoconf 2.69?, Mike Frysinger, 18:25
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, Linda Walsh, 17:37
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, Greg Wooledge, 17:01
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, Linda Walsh, 16:26
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, Greg Wooledge, 16:08
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, Linda Walsh, 15:17
- Re: weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, Greg Wooledge, 14:37
- weird problem -- path interpretted/eval'd as numeric expression, Linda Walsh, 14:29
- Re: autoconf 2.69?, Chet Ramey, 14:03
- Re: rename directory and internal pwd command., Bob Proulx, 13:20
- Re: autoconf 2.69?, Mike Frysinger, 13:03
- rename directory and internal pwd command., Masato Asou, 12:36
- autoconf 2.69?, Roman Rakus, 11:44
March 26, 2013
- Re: Assignments preceding "declare" affect brace and pathname expansion., Chet Ramey, 20:34
- Re: SIGTERM ignored before exec race, Chet Ramey, 11:23
March 25, 2013
- A few possible process substitution issues, Dan Douglas, 23:25
- Assignments preceding "declare" affect brace and pathname expansion., Dan Douglas, 21:44
- "typeset +x var" to a variable exported to a function doesn't remove it from the environment., Dan Douglas, 21:37
- Re: SIGTERM ignored before exec race, Pádraig Brady, 18:45
- Re: SIGTERM ignored before exec race, Chet Ramey, 10:56
- Re: SIGTERM ignored before exec race, Pádraig Brady, 10:34
March 23, 2013
- Re: unfamiliar construct..., Pierre Gaston, 05:08
- unfamiliar construct..., Linda A. Walsh, 05:01
- Re: bug-report/request: allow "set +n" to re-enable commands., Chris Down, 00:50
March 22, 2013
- bug-report/request: allow "set +n" to re-enable commands., Richard Neill, 17:07
March 21, 2013
- default completion should work after "do", Darko Veberic, 20:27
- Re: Unexpected behavior of single quotes when used in the patsub PE., Chet Ramey, 11:33
- RE: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel setings?)..., Bruce Dawson, 02:35
- Re: Unexpected behavior of single quotes when used in the patsub PE., Eduardo A . Bustamante López, 01:39
March 20, 2013
- Re: Unexpected behavior of single quotes when used in the patsub PE., Chet Ramey, 21:15
- Unexpected behavior of single quotes when used in the patsub PE., Eduardo A . Bustamante López, 17:57
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel setings?)..., Linda Walsh, 14:38
- RE: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel setings?)..., Bruce Dawson, 13:53
- RE: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel setings?)..., Bruce Dawson, 10:43
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel setings?)..., Linda Walsh, 04:12
- RE: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel setings?)..., Bruce Dawson, 00:22
March 19, 2013
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel setings?)..., Linda Walsh, 18:41
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel setings?)..., Linda Walsh, 17:51
- RE: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel setings?)..., Bruce Dawson, 16:57
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel setings?)..., Linda Walsh, 12:10
- RE: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel setings?)..., Bruce Dawson, 11:48
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel setings?)..., Linda Walsh, 11:18
- RE: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel setings?)..., Bruce Dawson, 10:52
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel setings?)..., Pierre Gaston, 05:00
March 18, 2013
- RE: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel setings?)..., Bruce Dawson, 23:03
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel setings?)..., Linda Walsh, 22:14
- Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 18:26
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time', Linda Walsh, 18:13
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time', Chris Down, 05:03
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time', Linda Walsh, 03:47
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time', Jonathan Nieder, 01:07
- RE: Bug/limitation in 'time', Chris F.A. Johnson, 00:41
- RE: Bug/limitation in 'time', Bruce Dawson, 00:37
March 17, 2013
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time', Linda Walsh, 23:36
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time', Dan Douglas, 19:11
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time', Pierre Gaston, 15:59
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time', Bob Proulx, 15:08
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time', Pierre Gaston, 13:05
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time', Hans J. Albertsson, 12:43
- RE: Bug/limitation in 'time', Bruce Dawson, 12:06
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time', Pierre Gaston, 02:31
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time', Chris F.A. Johnson, 01:47
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time', Chris Down, 01:12
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time', William Park, 01:09
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time', Chris F.A. Johnson, 00:48
- RE: Bug/limitation in 'time', Bruce Dawson, 00:23
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time', Chris Down, 00:10
March 16, 2013
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time', Chris Down, 22:35
- RE: Bug/limitation in 'time', Bruce Dawson, 22:33
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time', Chris Down, 21:58
- Bug/limitation in 'time', Bruce Dawson, 21:51
- Re: If rbash is worthless, why not remove it and decrease bloat?, Chris Down, 19:50
- Re: If rbash is worthless, why not remove it and decrease bloat?, Pierre Gaston, 17:06
- Re: If rbash is worthless, why not remove it and decrease bloat?, Chris Down, 12:29
- Re: If rbash is worthless, why not remove it and decrease bloat?, Chet Ramey, 12:13
March 15, 2013
- Re: If rbash is worthless, why not remove it and decrease bloat?, Bob Proulx, 21:29
- If rbash is worthless, why not remove it and decrease bloat?, Linda Walsh, 16:01
March 14, 2013
- Re: trim_pathname in general.c should use memmove rather than memcpy, Chet Ramey, 10:35
- Re: ignoring current shell and always running posix shell? Re: Should this be this way?, Chet Ramey, 09:36
- Re: ignoring current shell and always running posix shell? Re: Should this be this way?, Greg Wooledge, 08:30
- Re: ignoring current shell and always running posix shell? Re: Should this be this way?, Chris Down, 02:56
- Re: ignoring current shell and always running posix shell? Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 02:53
March 13, 2013
- trim_pathname in general.c should use memmove rather than memcpy, Matthew Riley, 20:51
- trap behaviour different depending on stdio redirection?, Charles Smith, 20:51
- Re: [Help-bash] brace expansion in non-C locales, Chet Ramey, 11:44
- Fw: trap behaviour different depending on stdio redirection?, Charles Smith, 11:38
- Re: trap behaviour different depending on stdio redirection?, Charles Smith, 11:21
- Re: trap behaviour different depending on stdio redirection?, Andreas Schwab, 10:49
- trap behaviour different depending on stdio redirection?, Charles Smith, 10:34
- brace expansion in non-C locales, Hans J. Albertsson, 10:34
- trap behaviour different depending on stdio redirection?, Charles Smith, 10:34
- Re: Here document / redirection / background process weirdness, Chet Ramey, 09:15
- Re: Here document / redirection / background process weirdness, Martin Jackson, 09:05
March 12, 2013
- Feature request: NUL delimiter for mapfile/readarray, Charles Duffy, 11:16
- Re: ignoring current shell and always running posix shell? Re: Should this be this way?, Chet Ramey, 10:36
- Re: ignoring current shell and always running posix shell? Re: Should this be this way?, Pierre Gaston, 03:12
March 11, 2013
- Re: ignoring current shell and always running posix shell? Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 18:37
- Re: ignoring current shell and always running posix shell? Re: Should this be this way?, Pierre Gaston, 13:24
- ignoring current shell and always running posix shell? Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 13:12
March 10, 2013
- Re: show-all-if-ambiguous inserts spurious backslashes, Chet Ramey, 22:52
- show-all-if-ambiguous inserts spurious backslashes, Felix, 17:26
- Bash-4.2 Official Patch 45, Chet Ramey, 12:15
- Bash-4.2 Official Patch 44, Chet Ramey, 12:14
- Bash-4.2 Official Patch 43, Chet Ramey, 12:14
March 05, 2013
- Re: gnu parallel in the bash manual, John Kearney, 23:32
- Re: gnu parallel in the bash manual, Linda Walsh, 19:03
- Re: documentation... readonly help is not accurate, Chet Ramey, 17:09
- Here document / redirection / background process weirdness, Martin Jackson, 09:28
March 04, 2013
- Re: documentation... readonly help is not accurate, Gotmy Nick, 11:12
- Re: documentation... readonly help is not accurate, Chet Ramey, 08:52
- documentation... readonly help is not accurate, Gotmy Nick, 02:04
March 03, 2013
- Re: gnu parallel in the bash manual, John Kearney, 10:09
- Re: Bash git repository on savannah, Pádraig Brady, 03:58
March 02, 2013
- Re: gnu parallel in the bash manual, Chet Ramey, 19:47
- Re: gnu parallel in the bash manual, Chet Ramey, 18:45
- Re: PATCH: compile Bash 4.2 with DJGPP, Chet Ramey, 17:20
- Re: PATCH: compile Bash 4.2 with DJGPP, Chris Down, 10:20
- Re: PATCH: compile Bash 4.2 with DJGPP, Fabrizio Gennari, 10:11
- Re: PATCH: compile Bash 4.2 with DJGPP, Chris Down, 09:17
- PATCH: compile Bash 4.2 with DJGPP, Fabrizio Gennari, 08:52
- Re: Leveraging the completion system to discover available options in a command, Davide Brini, 05:22
March 01, 2013
- Re: Should this be this way?, Chet Ramey, 19:28
- Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 17:04
- Leveraging the completion system to discover available options in a command, Idan Kamara, 13:04
- Re: export in posix mode, Chet Ramey, 11:55
- Re: More fun with IFS, Dan Douglas, 10:38
- Re: More fun with IFS, Thorsten Glaser, 08:13
- Re: More fun with IFS, Dan Douglas, 07:51
- Re: More fun with IFS, Thorsten Glaser, 07:01
- Re: More fun with IFS, Dan Douglas, 02:11

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

Mail converted by MHonArc