[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is the description of set -- missing in man bash or at least difficu
From: |
Peng Yu |
Subject: |
Re: Is the description of set -- missing in man bash or at least difficult to find? |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:24:16 -0600 |
> Second, just search for the 'set' builtin, near the bottom of the man page.
Thank for clarifying the usage of set.
I looked closely to the document of set. I just find another problem,
it says the following. However, the description of -- way down below.
It should be the option be described. A rule of thumb is that the
order of the description of the options should be the same as the
order in the following line.
set [--abefhkmnptuvxBCEHPT] [-o option-name] [arg ...]
But my main point is if a person only knows the keyword $@, he will
not be able to find how to set it in the manual. The description of
'set --' should also be added to the description of $@ to explain how
to set $@.
Also, "If no arguments follow this option, then the positional
parameters are unset. Otherwise, the positional parameters are set to
the args, even if some of them begin with a -."
should be rewritten as
"If no arguments follow this option, then the positional parameters $@
are unset. Otherwise, the positional parameters $@ are set to the
args, even if some of them begin with a -."
so that $@ is searchable.
--
Regards,
Peng
Re: Is the description of set -- missing in man bash or at least difficult to find?, Chris Jones, 2011/12/22
Message not available
- Re: Is the description of set -- missing in man bash or at least difficult to find?,
Peng Yu <=