[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Yet Another test option
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: Yet Another test option |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Jul 2011 09:38:25 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 |
On 7/5/11 8:59 AM, Bruce Korb wrote:
>> The issue is extremely nontrivial.
>
> The normal case is to sort full releases. The goal in "sort -V" was to make
> the usual case easy, not to make an authoritative solution to the intractable
> problem. In any event, Chet doesn't think there is sufficient demand for the
> facility and I certainly defer to that. In my little world, it would be quite
> convenient.
This is an excellent argument for a utility to perform version comparisons.
Such a program could be arbitrarily complex. This feature is too new to
know how it will evolve.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
- Yet Another test option, Bruce Korb, 2011/07/02
- Re: Yet Another test option, Chet Ramey, 2011/07/03
- Re: Yet Another test option, Bruce Korb, 2011/07/03
- Re: Yet Another test option, Bob Proulx, 2011/07/03
- Re: Yet Another test option, Greg Wooledge, 2011/07/05
- Re: Yet Another test option, Bruce Korb, 2011/07/05
- Re: Yet Another test option,
Chet Ramey <=
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Yet Another test option, Eric Blake, 2011/07/06
- Re: Yet Another test option, Bruce Korb, 2011/07/06
- Re: Yet Another test option, Chet Ramey, 2011/07/06