[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang
From: |
Paul Jarc |
Subject: |
Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:13:08 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.nz> wrote:
> pk wrote:
>> This is documented in man bash, and only happens in interactive shells (not
>> scripts).
>
> I just tried putting my six cases into a script, and I get exactly the same
> sort of output as interactively.
How did you invoke the script? If you do ". ./script", then the
script commands are being run in the interactive shell, so you'll get
the same behavior as if you typed them directly. "./script" will run
those commands in a new, non-interactive shell.
paul
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, pk, 2008/07/16
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2008/07/18
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2008/07/18
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2008/07/18
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang,
Paul Jarc <=
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, pk, 2008/07/18
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2008/07/19
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2008/07/19
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2008/07/20
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2008/07/20
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2008/07/22