[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [squid-users] Re: my "CPPUNIT" is "broken"... ;-) ?
From: |
Henrik Nordstrom |
Subject: |
Re: [squid-users] Re: my "CPPUNIT" is "broken"... ;-) ? |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Mar 2006 00:53:54 +0100 |
lör 2006-03-18 klockan 14:15 -0800 skrev Linda W:
> Bash added the "feature" to allow dropping of the leading
> "0", accepting strings: "\0nnn", "\nnn", and "\xHH". I'm guessing that
> most bash users run in a shell that has expansion turned off by default or
> this would have come up before.
the xpg_echo bash option..
Lets see what this does to configure shall we.. oh, yes it fails
miserably with this bash option set.
please send this to the autoconf maintainers as well. Probably they can
add a rule detecting this kind of systems and falling back on an
alternative somewhat slower echo method..
Regards
Henrik
signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
- Re: [squid-users] Re: my "CPPUNIT" is "broken"... ;-) ?, Linda W, 2006/03/23
- Re: [squid-users] Re: my "CPPUNIT" is "broken"... ;-) ?,
Henrik Nordstrom <=
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Linda W, 2006/03/23
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Paul Eggert, 2006/03/20
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Andreas Schwab, 2006/03/20
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Paul Eggert, 2006/03/20
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Andreas Schwab, 2006/03/20
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Paul Eggert, 2006/03/27
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Eric Blake, 2006/03/28
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Chet Ramey, 2006/03/20
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Henrik Nordstrom, 2006/03/23
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Paul Eggert, 2006/03/19