[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.05b segfaults on extremely long "for" lists
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: 2.05b segfaults on extremely long "for" lists |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:16:36 -0400 |
> Machine Type: i486-incept-linux-gnu
>
> Bash Version: 2.05b
> Patch Level: 0
> Release Status: release
>
> Description:
> If I cause bash to run through a for loop with a great many arguments, it
> segfaults. Probably an overflow somewhere...
>
> Repeat-By:
> I managed to force a segfault with the following test:
>
> [ kelledin@valhalla ~ ] # for FNAME in /usr/share/* \
> > /usr/share/*/*/* \
> > /usr/share/*/*/*/* \
> > /usr/share/*/*/*/*/*; do=20
> > file $FNAME;=20
> > done
>
> On my system, this gives the for loop 17,924 items to work on.
I cannot reproduce this on Red Hat 7.0, compiled with RH's gcc 2.96,
with 26412 items in the for loop list. I used both static and dynamic
versions of bash.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
( ``Discere est Dolere'' -- chet )
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@po.CWRU.Edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/