|
From: | Vangelis Evangelou |
Subject: | bug#58005: 13.1.4; Can't work with indirect buffers |
Date: | Thu, 25 Apr 2024 09:46:19 +0100 |
Hi Vangelis,
>>>>> Vangelis Evangelou <evangelou@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi all.
> I'm not sure what the ideal outcome is. It depends on each user's case. In
> principle, indirect buffers have identical text content as their base
> buffer, but different view properties, so the previews not showing in the
> indirect buffer agrees with this principle. I therefore, agree with Paul's
> comment.
Thank you. Then I think AUCTeX can incorporate your proposal. Can you
make an entry for doc/changes.texi and send the diff?
To AUCTeX admins: Do you think Vangelis'es patch needs copyright
assignment? In my opinion, it doesn't because definition of
`TeX-buffer-file-name' is straightforward and other changes are trivial
(replacements of `buffer-file-name' -> `TeX-buffer-file-name' or
additions of `(with-current-buffer (or (buffer-base-buffer)
(current-buffer))...')
Regards,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
#Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW
indirect-changes.diff
Description: Text Data
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |